Russian troops ‘expelled’ from kyiv, do not withdraw, says Ukrainian MP

  • Russia withdrew its forces near kyiv because its troops were “expelled”, a Ukrainian MP has said, according to CNN.
  • The troop cuts announced by Moscow were really meant to “save face”, said MK Anastasia Radina.
  • During a visit to the United States, she and other Ukrainian lawmakers warned that negotiations with Russia should not be trusted.

Ukrainian MP says Russia’s intention in withdrawing troops from Kyiv region was ‘to save face’ and that its forces were ‘expelled’, casting doubt on Moscow’s real interest in doing the peace.

“We believe that these are not real peace talks at this stage,” MK Anastasia Radina, head of Ukraine’s parliament’s anti-corruption committee, told CNN.

“We think what Russia is doing is trying to save face. They say they are withdrawing troops from the Kyiv region. This is not true for one simple reason: they are not withdrawing… They have been expelled [out]“, continued Radina.

She and another Ukrainian lawmaker — Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, chair of the parliamentary committee on Ukraine’s integration into the European Union — spoke to reporters on Wednesday during a visit to Washington DC, Natasha reported. Bertrand from CNN.

Klympush-Tsintsadze shared Radina’s skepticism of Russia’s claims that it is working to achieve peace with Ukraine, calling the recent ceasefire talks the president’s ‘smokescreen’ Russian Vladimir Putin to give his forces time to regroup, according to CNN.

According to The Associated Press.

One of their key messages to the United States was not to trust negotiations with Moscow, AP reported.

“Putin cannot be trusted,” said Yevheniya Kravchuk, a Ukrainian lawmaker, according to the outlet.

On Tuesday, Ukrainian and Russian delegations met in Istanbul, Turkey, for the fourth round of ceasefire talks.

Both kyiv and Moscow have reportedly shown a willingness to concede previous sticking points, with Ukraine offering full neutrality in return for security guarantees and Russia dropping many of its key initial demands like “denazification” of its neighbour.

However, it remains unclear whether a real ceasefire can be brokered anytime soon, with both sides downplaying the possibility of a meaningful breakthrough before and after the talks.

Shortly after the Istanbul meeting, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin announced that Moscow would scale back its military assaults on kyiv and Chernihiv in northern Ukraine.

Fomin said that Russia’s decision was aimed “to increase mutual trust and create the necessary conditions for the continuation of negotiations and the achievement of the ultimate goal of an agreement on the signing of the above agreement. “. [peace] OK.”

The Pentagon and the Ukrainian military later questioned Russia’s motives for its apparent reduction, saying the Kremlin was likely repositioning troops for a push on other warfronts. Despite its claims of withdrawal, Russia continued to bomb Kyiv suburbs after the peace talks.

Klympush-Tsintsadze also mentioned on Wednesday another obstacle to the ceasefire effort: Ukraine’s neutrality vis-à-vis NATO would have to be put to a referendum that she and her colleagues do not believe. likely to pass.

“Neutrality is not an option for Ukraine,” she said, according to CNN. “I want everyone to understand that we weren’t aligned. We were an off-bloc country in 2014. That didn’t stop Putin from attacking us then. And that didn’t stop him from taking over some of our territory won’t stop it.”

It’s been 35 days since Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. According to the latest UN count, at least 1,179 Ukrainian civilians were killed during the war, while 1,860 were injured. However, the UN noted that the true number of casualties is likely much higher.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.